Response: How Our Revenue Replacement Strategy Covers Schools and Local Services
I appreciate this concern — it’s an important and fair question.
Let’s break this down step by step.
1. Core Goal: Fully Replace Property Tax Revenue Without Raising Burden on Families
Our plan is designed to eliminate property taxes permanently while maintaining — and protecting — critical services like:
- Local government operations
- County services
- Public schools
We do this with two tools:
- Gross Receipts Tax (GRT)
- Spending reductions and government efficiency
2. Revenue Math: Does the GRT Cover School and Local Government Spending?
Let’s look at the numbers.
- Current property tax revenue in SD: ~$1.6 billion annually
- Out of that, schools rely on: ~$900 million
- Counties & local services rely on: ~$500 million
Now, let’s compare:
- 2.5% GRT estimated annual revenue: ~$1.625 billion
✅ Conclusion:
➡️ The 2.5% GRT fully covers existing property tax revenue, including full school and local service funding levels.
3. What About the State Budget Overall?
- South Dakota’s total state spending is ~$7.29 billion.
- GRT isn’t meant to replace all spending — it’s targeted at property tax replacement only.
- Existing sales tax and other revenues stay in place to fund the general state budget.
✅ Conclusion:
➡️ We’re not replacing sales tax or other funding streams.
➡️ We’re only removing property tax, and GRT directly replaces it dollar-for-dollar.
4. Local Government & Schools: Protected
To avoid any risk to schools and local services, we’re including legal guarantees in our plan:
- GRT revenue is legally earmarked for services previously funded by property tax.
- 60% of GRT directly funds schools, ensuring no loss of education funding.
- 30% of GRT funds local government services like roads, law enforcement, fire protection, and county programs.
- 10% funds infrastructure and essential public services.
Additionally, the South Dakota Department of Government Efficiency (SD-DOGE) monitors this to enforce transparency and prevent misuse of funds.
✅ Conclusion:
➡️ Schools and local services are not only protected — they are legally prioritized.
5. Efficiency Gains: A Bonus, Not a Replacement
Our government efficiency plan (through SD-DOGE) is about:
- Eliminating waste (county assessors, bureaucratic overlap).
- Streamlining services.
- Cutting administrative fat from the system.
These savings (estimated at ~$350 million annually) go back to taxpayers and into essential services — they are not relied upon to “cover the gap.”
✅ Conclusion:
➡️ Efficiency savings make the system stronger, but they are not the backbone of funding. GRT is.
6. No Hidden Cuts, No Backdoor Taxes
Let’s be clear:
- No new taxes on families.
- No cuts to classrooms or county services.
- No shifting of costs to towns or counties.
- No risk of homeowners losing services.
We are designing this to be fully self-contained and fiscally stable.
Bottom Line:
Will schools and local services be cut?
➡️ No. We’re fully funding them, legally protecting them, and auditing spending to ensure it stays that way.
Are we relying on cuts alone?
➡️ No. GRT covers the revenue. Spending cuts are an added efficiency measure — not a replacement for core funding.
Does this reduce risk?
➡️ Yes. Homeowners are protected from property tax foreclosure, schools are legally funded, and local governments stay whole.