As your governor, I am committed to safeguarding the Second Amendment from federal overreach. I pledge not to approve or Veto any legislation that infringes upon our Second Amendment rights, including unconstitutional red flag laws. I will utilize executive orders and the process of nullification, directing the attorney general to oppose any gun laws that violate the text of the Second Amendment or citizens’ right to self-defense..
Courts and Lawmakers must first analyze the Second Amendment’s text, and then consult history to determine whether the regulation is consistent with America’s tradition of firearm regulation
Before anyone opposed to liberty raises concerns about associated costs, let’s consider this scenario: a passive population, comfortably seated at home, scrolling through TikTok videos while relying on the welfare state. This stands in stark contrast to a well-trained civilian population capable of playing a crucial role in supporting professional emergency responders.
See action Items Below this text:
Gun-free zones not only violate our constitutional rights but also infringe upon our inalienable right to self-defense.
First and foremost, the Bill of Rights serves as a cornerstone of our constitutional Republic, placing limits on the actions of governments at all levels, whether federal or local. Importantly, these rights extend to all entities, both private and public, operating within the boundaries of our Republic. For instance, businesses such as local stores enjoy the protections afforded by the constitution, but they cannot selectively enforce or disregard specific constitutional provisions. While it might seem counterintuitive to restrict discussions about football in a private business, such censorship would infringe upon freedom of speech, just as establishing gun-free zones would violate the right to self-defense. It’s essential to recognize that on American soil, the constitution reigns as the supreme law, regardless of any attempts to suggest otherwise. Unfortunately, deceptive practices and political agendas have often clouded this truth. While the constitution may have political origins, its primary purpose is to safeguard the rights of the people. Anyone who suggests otherwise poses a threat to liberty and the foundational principles upon which our nation stands.
As your governor, I am committed to safeguarding the Second Amendment from federal overreach. I pledge not to approve or Veto any legislation that infringes upon our Second Amendment rights, including unconstitutional red flag laws. I will utilize executive orders and the process of nullification, directing the attorney general to oppose any gun laws that violate the text of the Second Amendment or citizens’ right to self-defense..
Now, before any individuals opposed to liberty complain about associated costs, consider this: a complacent population sitting on the couch, scrolling through tic tick videos while they are supported by welfare state, contrasts sharply with a well-trained civilian population that can play a critical role in supporting professional emergency responders
Before anyone opposed to liberty voices concerns about associated costs, let’s consider the contrast: a complacent population, idly scrolling through TikTok videos while relying on state welfare, versus a well-trained civilian population capable of playing a crucial role in supporting professional emergency responders.
See action Items Below this text:
Gun-free zones not only violate our constitutional rights but also infringe upon our inalienable right to self-defense.
First and foremost, the Bill of Rights serves as a cornerstone of our constitutional Republic, placing limits on the actions of governments at all levels, whether federal or local. Importantly, these rights extend to all entities, both private and public, operating within the boundaries of our Republic. For instance, businesses such as local stores enjoy the protections afforded by the constitution, but they cannot selectively enforce or disregard specific constitutional provisions. While it might seem counterintuitive to restrict discussions about football in a private business, such censorship would infringe upon freedom of speech, just as establishing gun-free zones would violate the right to self-defense. It’s essential to recognize that on American soil, the constitution reigns as the supreme law, regardless of any attempts to suggest otherwise. Unfortunately, deceptive practices and political agendas have often clouded this truth. While the constitution may have political origins, its primary purpose is to safeguard the rights of the people. Anyone who suggests otherwise poses a threat to liberty and the foundational principles upon which our nation stands.
There are two types of people opposed to the Second Amendment.
The first group comprehends the purpose of the Second Amendment and aims to abolish it, seeking unchecked authority over the people without fear of consequences. The second group consists of individuals who lack understanding of the Second Amendment’s purpose. They have never sought to learn about it, as they have been indoctrinated by the lies perpetuated by the first group.
“Throughout history, despots, tyrants, dictators, and kings have enforced their will upon those they conquered. Following victories in battle, many of these rulers established cruel and ruthless regimes, maintaining power by rendering the subjugated powerless to resist.
Action item:
Bold New Firearm Policy Sets National Standard
South Dakota will take inspiration from Finland at the state level, positioning itself as a haven for firearms ownership. We will bolster gun rights and public safety through a groundbreaking initiative to establish 200 new shooting ranges across the state. This ambitious project aims not only to improve state readiness and civilian preparedness but also to ingrained responsible gun ownership into the fabric of South Dakota society. As geopolitical tensions escalate, South Dakota’s proactive strategy sets a nationwide standard for empowering citizens while strengthening state security
The increase in shooting ranges is also intended to promote responsible gun ownership among the South Dakota population. With more facilities available, individuals will have better access to proper training and safety courses. This is expected to reduce accidents and ensure that gun owners are more skilled and knowledgeable
The construction and operation of 200 new shooting ranges are anticipated to provide an economic boost to many local communities. Job creation in construction, facility management, and training roles will directly benefit local economies. Additionally, these ranges are likely to attract visitors, further increasing local spending and economic activity.
There has been a notable increase in demand for firearms training among American citizens, driven by concerns over state and National security. The state government’s initiative to open more shooting ranges directly addresses this demand, ensuring that citizens can access high-quality training. This approach not only enhances personal security but also contributes to national safety
Enhancing Emergency Preparedness and Medical Training
By improving access to shooting ranges, South Dakota is enhancing its emergency preparedness capabilities. In the event of a state emergency, a well-trained civilian population can play a critical role in supporting professional emergency responders. This preparation is crucial for maintaining stability and security during crises.
By improving access to shooting ranges, South Dakota is enhancing its emergency preparedness capabilities. In the event of a state emergency, a well-trained civilian population can play a critical role in supporting professional emergency responders. This preparation is crucial for maintaining stability and security during crises.
Supporting Female Shooters
Recognizing the increasing interest among women in shooting sports and defense training, the South Dakota aims to make shooting ranges more accessible to female shooters. This inclusivity promotes women in sports and defense preparedness, ensuring that all citizens have equal opportunities to train and participate in defense activities.
The U.S. would benefit greatly from adopting a policy similar to Finland’s expansion of shooting ranges, primarily due to the comprehensive advantages it offers in terms of national security, public safety, and economic growth. By providing more widespread and accessible training facilities, the U.S. can enhance civilian preparedness, support responsible gun ownership, and boost local economies through job creation and tourism. Additionally, such a policy would support recreational and competitive shooting, improve homeland security, and foster educational opportunities that instill discipline and responsibility in younger generations. This holistic approach not only addresses practical training needs but also strengthens community and national resilience.
Recognizing the increasing interest among women in shooting sports and defense training, the South Dakota aims to make shooting ranges more accessible to female shooters. This inclusivity promotes women in sports and defense preparedness, ensuring that all citizens have equal opportunities to train and participate in defense activities.
Supporting Recreational and Competitive Shooting
Expanding shooting ranges would support recreational and competitive shooting, activities that are already popular across many states. This would not only promote these sports but also help in maintaining a competitive edge in international shooting competitions. Moreover, it can foster community engagement and bring economic benefits through sporting events and associated tourism.
Encouraging Youth Education and Discipline
The expansion of shooting ranges could also be used as a platform for youth education programs that teach discipline, responsibility, and respect for firearms. Programs can be designed to incorporate aspects of STEM education, such as ballistics and engineering, thus providing a multidisciplinary educational experience. This approach could help in shaping a responsible future generation of gun owners and enthusiasts.
More Action Items:
The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads:
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
Definitions:
Citizen: “A member of this Constitutional Republic”
People: “The whole body of this Constitutional Republic”
Bear Arms: “To present arms; to carry or present arms of any type, regardless of configuration or functionality or any advancements in technology”
The Right to Bear Arms:
- The Right to Bear Arms(weapons or firearms/Arms) is a fundamental requirement for maintaining our freedom from Tyranny in any form, including from our own government, To that extent, to protect the blessings of liberty and the security of freedom, the people will maintain their right to keep and bear arms, regardless of make, manufacturer, model, feature(s), or functionality, or operation or rate of fire or, any aspects related to the bearing, holding, carrying, transportation, or storage of said arms. Furthermore, advancements in technology may never change this provision. This right shall not be infringed upon by any of the current Local, State, Federal, or Governmental “Authorities”, nor any government appointed or private entity, within the confines of out state .Additionally, any Restrictions, Bans, or Embargoes placed upon the people pertaining to, or stemming from that same right, including but not limited to, sales, purchasing, access to, ammunition for, or accessories, of any type for said arms shall be unlawful and are hereby included in the infringement clause. Furthermore, the use of Taxation, is also hereby included in the infringement clause.
- The Right to Maintain their Rights:
Citizens have, and shall maintain the right, to match arms with any governmental or private entity. It shall be deemed unlawful to have gun or firearm “free zones” established at any level of government, or by any private entity. This includes at the current Local, City, State, and Federal levels. Doing so would be a crime against the Constitution, and the people’s ability to protect themselves against any threat of bodily harm. It shall be within the rights of the citizens to act with the full authorization contained within this amendment, to ensure the restoration of, and the maintaining of these rights, including the use of force if needed.
- Enforcement:
Any individual, governmental, private representative, or entity at any level of the government that introduces or votes to pass any new law, legislation, ordinance, or resolution on any aspects related to the bearing, holding, carrying, transportation, or storage of firearms, or, any aspect included within this amendment will be considered unlawful. Their position will be automatically forfeited and they shall never be allowed to serve in any function of the government, even at the Local, State, or Federal levels for the remainder of their lifetime. Furthermore, local law enforcement has the full authority to remove any individual who does not self-vacate. In the unlikely event that the local law enforcement fails to act on the same, they also will forfeit their positions immediately and can no longer serve in any capacity in the government for their lifetime as well. Should the above occur, then any local Constitutional Militia (State Guard) shall have the right and duty, along with full law enforcement authority, including the use of deadly force, to remove the guilty parties and restore order in that area. furthermore any agency is barred from assisting in any effort of enforcement of any items in this infringement clause.
- Immutable Survivability:
To maintain the security of this Amendment and these rights, it can never be altered to the point of rendering it mutable, overruled, removed, preceded, or superseded by any current or future Law. Nor shall it by dis-joined, altered, or removed by any Member of the Republic, or, by any level of Government including but not limited to, Local, City, County, State, Federal, Executive Order, Treaty, or by any clause and/or court ruling worldwide, including globally, so long as any portion of the Republic remains, in any location .The spirit of and the covenants listed here and above may only be amended to facilitate the desires of the Citizens in their community, (Not Globally) and the Citizens therein are responsible for the voting and documentation of the same, and also for ensuring that the implementation of said changes, does not violate or alter the 1st (2) rights listed, which shall always remain immutable regardless.